koficlaus@gmail.com
Innovation is not limited to new products or services. It includes
thinking up new businesses and business processes.
thinking up new businesses and business processes.
Professor Kotler / Marketing A-Z
True innovation is gear towards
customer value, but goes beyond new
products to companies completely rewiring themselves. Leading innovators are changing
their industries not just their products -
Nigel F. Piercy / Market-Led Strategic Change Steve Jobs
Consider these innovations
1.
Installment payments: has helped
most Ghanaians to buy land build houses
worth millions.
2.
Weekend courses and evening schools:
has helped worked do their MBA’s and has increased customers for schools
If no body is buying from you it’s
because you are not innovating. Your products may be the same but social innovations in your
business model can turn your business around and make your rich! Innovation is
not only about technology, innovate in your payment systems, time for doing
business and other areas of your business.
Claus can help you.
Big companies are finding it
difficult to innovate because of the fatness or ‘red tapism’ we know them for.
Read this…………..
Multinationals Stake a Claim in Venture Capital
ENLO PARK, Calif. — New York, London
and Hong Kong are common addresses for blue-chip multinationals. Now Silicon
Valley is, too.
From downtown San Francisco to Palo
Alto, companies like American Express and Ford are opening offices and
investing millions of dollars in local start-ups. This year, American Express
opened a venture capital office in Facebook’s
old headquarters in downtown Palo Alto. Less than three miles away, General
Motors’ research lab houses full-time investment professionals,
recent transplants from Detroit.
“American Express is a 162-year-old
company, and this is a moment of transformation,” said Harshul Sanghi, a
managing partner at American Express Ventures, the venture capital arm of the
financial company. “We’re here to be a part of the fabric of innovation.”
The companies are raising their
profiles in Silicon Valley at a shaky time for the broader venture capital
industry. While top players like Andreessen Horowitz and Accel Partners have
grown bigger, most venture capital firms are struggling with anemic returns.
The market for start-ups has also
dimmed, in the wake of the sharp stock declines of Facebook, Zynga
and Groupon,
the once high-flying threesome that was supposed to lead the next Internet
boom.
But unlike traditional venture
capitalists, multinationals are less interested in profits. They are here to
buy innovation — or at least get a peek at the next wave of emerging
technologies.
In August, Starbucks
invested $25 million in Square, the mobile payments company based in San
Francisco, which will be used in the coffee chain’s stores. This year, Citi
Ventures, a unit of Citigroup,
invested in Plastic Jungle, an online exchange for gift cards, and Jumio, an
online credit card scanner.
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, the
large Spanish banking group, opened an office in San Francisco last year. The
team, which has about $100 million to fund local start-ups, is looking for
consumer applications that will help the bank create new businesses and better
understand its customers.
“We are in one of the most regulated
and risk-averse industries in the world, so innovation doesn’t come naturally
to us,” said Jay Reinemann, the head of the BBVA office. “We want to avoid the
video-rental model. We want to evolve alongside our consumers.”
The companies are hoping to tap into
the entrepreneurial mind-set. Multinationals, with their huge payrolls and
sprawling operations, are not as nimble as the younger upstarts. While they are
rich in resources, big companies tend to be more gun-shy and usually require
more time to bring a product to market.
“Companies cannot innovate as fast
as start-ups; increasingly they realize they have to look outside,” said Gerald
Brady, a managing director at Silicon Valley Bank, who previously led the
early-stage venture arm of Siemens. “We think it’s happening a lot more
than people recognize or acknowledge.”
Of the 750 corporate venture units,
roughly 200 were established in the last two years, according to Global
Corporate Venturing, a publication that tracks the market. In the last year,
corporations participated in more than $20 billion of start-up investments.
Big business has played the role of
venture capitalist before, with limited success. During the waning days of the
dot-com boom, financial, media and telecommunications companies sank billions
of dollars into start-ups.
The collapse was devastating.
Although some managed to make money, far more burned through their cash. In
2002, Accenture,
the consulting firm, scrapped its venture capital unit after taking more than
$200 million in write-downs. The previous year, Wells Fargo reported $1.6 billion in losses on
its venture capital investments. Dell,
the computer maker, closed its venture arm in 2004 and sold its portfolio to an
investment firm. (It resurrected the unit last year).
Companies say they are taking a
different approach this time. Rather than making big bets across the Internet
sector, investments are smaller and more selective.
“We invest with the idea that we’re
a potential customer for a company,” Jon Lauckner, G.M.’s chief technology
officer said. “We’re not looking to make several $5 million investments
and make $10 million on each. That would be nice, but it’s not important.”
As they try to find the right
start-ups, some are forging tight bonds with local firms. BBVA, for example, is
an investor in 500 Startups, a venture firm that specializes in early-stage
start-ups and is run by Dave McClure, a former PayPal executive.
Unilever
and PepsiCo
are limited partners in Physic Ventures, a venture capital firm designed to
help corporate investors build commercial partnerships with portfolio
companies. Both Unilever and PepsiCo have installed full-time employees in
Physic’s downtown San Francisco offices.
American Express has stacked its
investment team with technology veterans. Mr. Sanghi, the head of the office,
has spent roughly three decades in Silicon Valley and formerly led Motorola
Mobility’s venture arm. Through its network of relationships, the office has
met with roughly 300 start-ups in the last six months.
The connections have started to pay
off. Vinod Khosla, the head of Khosla Ventures and a co-founder of Sun
Microsystems, introduced the American Express team to the executives at Ness
Computing, a mobile start-up. In August, American Express partnered with
Singtel, the Singapore wireless company, to invest $15 million in Ness.
Mr. Sanghi says Ness is a logical
investment and a potential partner. The start-up’s application connects users
to local businesses through customized search results.
“It’s trying to bring consumers and
merchants together in meaningful ways,” he said. “And we’re always trying to
find new ways to build value for our merchant and consumer network.”
For start-ups, a big corporate
benefactor can bring resources and an established platform to promote and
distribute products. Envia Systems, an electric car battery maker, picked General Motors
to lead its last financing round because it wanted to have a close relationship
with a major automaker, its “absolute end customer,” said Atul Kapadia, Envia’s
chief executive.
Although the company received higher
offers from other potential corporate investors, Envia wanted G.M.’s advice on
how to build the battery so that one day it could be a standard in the
company’s electric cars. After the investment, G.M. offered the start-up access
to its experts and facilities in Detroit, which Envia is using.
“You want to listen to your end
customer because they will help you figure out what specifications you need to
get into the final product,” said Mr. Kapadia.
A marriage with corporate investors
can be complicated. Besides G.M., Asahi Kasei and Asahi Glass, the Japanese
auto-part makers, are also investors in Envia. They both build rival battery
products for Japanese car companies.
Mr. Kapadia, who prizes their
insights into Japan’s market, says his company is careful about what intellectual
property information it shares with its investors. At board meetings,
confidential data about Envia’s customers is discussed only at the end, so that
conflicted corporate investors can easily excuse themselves.
“In our marriage, there has not been
a single ethics concern, because all the expectations were hashed out in the
beginning,” Mr. Kapadia said. “But I can see how this could be a land mine.”
For the big corporations, start-up
investing is fraught with the same risk as traditional venture investing. Their
bets might be modest, but blowups can be embarrassing and can rankle
shareholders, who may see venture investing as a distraction from the core
business.
OnLive, an online gaming service,
offers a recent reminder.
The company was once a darling of
corporate investors, with financing from the likes of Time
Warner, AutoDesk, HTC and AT&T. At one point, it was valued north
of $1 billion.
Despite its early promise, the
start-up crashed in August, taking many in Silicon Valley by surprise. The
company laid off its employees, announced a reorganization and in the process
slashed the value of the shares to zero.
“It can be painful when a deal goes
sour,” James Mawson, the founder of Global Corporate Venturing, said.
Source: nytimes
No comments:
Post a Comment